Flaherty Field traffic pattern
Pattern altitude at Flaherty Field (0LL4) is 1,464 ft MSL · 800 AGL as published by the FAA, and every runway end is standard left traffic. · Open on the map
All of Flaherty Field — runways, frequencies, charts and live weatherPattern diagram
Drawn to scale from the FAA NASR runway alignments and the per end right traffic flags — pick a runway to see its pattern. Live wind picks the favored runway when 0LL4 reports it.
RWY 27LEFT traffic
- Heading
- 270° mag · 270° true
- Dimensions
- 2,143 × 100 ft
- TPA
- 1,464 ft MSL · 800 AGL · charted
- Surface
- Turf
Enter the left downwind (heading 090°) on the 45° at 1,464 ft MSL.
More details — RWY 27
- Markings
- nonstandard
Pattern side: FAA NASR · TPA charted (NASR) · layout: schematic (headings + lengths)
Pattern direction by runway
| Runway | Pattern | Heading | Pattern altitude |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09 | Left traffic | 090° mag | 1,464 ft MSL · 800 AGL |
| 27 | Left traffic | 270° mag | 1,464 ft MSL · 800 AGL |
Pattern altitude is published for 0LL4 in the FAA NASR data. Headings are the runway alignment; downwind is the reciprocal.
Flying the pattern at 0LL4
Flaherty Field is non towered. AC 90-66B asks for a report on entry and on each leg, and for the standard 45° entry to downwind at pattern altitude.
All ends are left traffic, which is the FAR 91.126 default — turns to the left unless the field charts otherwise. The full entry procedure is here →
Frequently asked
What is the traffic pattern altitude at 0LL4?
The FAA publishes a traffic pattern altitude of 800 ft AGL for Flaherty Field, which is 1,464 ft MSL on the altimeter with the field at 664 ft.
Does 0LL4 have right traffic?
No. All 2 runway ends at Flaherty Field use standard left traffic, so no right pattern is charted here.
More about 0LL4
Pattern direction and alignment are drawn from the FAA NASR (28-day cycle); the diagram is generated, not an FAA chart. Pattern altitude is shown as published where NASR carries one, otherwise as the AC 90-66B 1,000 ft AGL convention. For planning and education only; always verify against the Chart Supplement.
Something here wrong or out of date? Report a data problem.